January 2, 2025
Advocating for Change: A Conversation about Compliance with Dr. Megan DeLeon
Dr. Megan DeLeon (Miller) is a renowned behavior analyst, author, and speaker. As the founder of the Do Better Collective, she is dedicated to advancing the field of behavior analysis. With a Ph.D. in Special Education and Behavior Analysis from The Ohio State University, and years of experience as an adjunct professor, Dr. DeLeon is a respected expert in her field. In addition to co-authoring several journal publications and book chapters, she is the co-author of 7 Steps to Earning Instructional Control. Her passion for empowering others in the field led her to launch the #dobetter professional development movement in 2018, offering training and resources through an online community, webinars, and a podcast.
The Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB), which oversees the credentialing of Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs), defines behavior-change intervention as “the full set of behavioral procedures designed to improve the client’s wellbeing” (BACB, 2020). Well-being, as defined by the Cambridge Dictionary, refers to “the state of feeling healthy and happy.”
While developing behavior interventions is more complex than these definitions might initially convey, and programs and procedures will vary significantly from learner to learner, the overarching goal of behavioral intervention remains consistent: to enhance well-being. Behavior analysts strive to achieve this by teaching new skills that are meaningful to each individual learner. While compliance is often important for personal safety, such as stopping at a red light, it’s unlikely to be a priority on most individuals’ lists of meaningful skills. Additionally, the autistic community has raised concerns about ABA procedures that prioritize compliance, noting potential vulnerabilities to abuse, limitations in self-advocacy, and other harmful side effects.
I extend my sincere gratitude to Dr. Megan DeLeon for joining me for this interview and for her steadfast dedication to “doing better” while inspiring other behavior professionals to do the same.
How do you define compliance within the context of ABA intervention?
As a formal definition, I think most of us were trained to define compliance as following an instruction within a certain period of time and non-compliance as the refusal to complete a task or comply with a demand.
ABA is a scientific discipline that examines how interactions with the environment shape behavior, employing behavioral principles to teach new skills. However, it has faced criticism for its historical emphasis on compliance. To help center this conversation, could you offer some insight into earlier applications and discuss the shifts towards more compassionate intervention approaches?
Sidman published Coercion and Its Fallout in the 1970s, signaling that the issue with compliance-based programming was identified as early as 50 years ago by one of the leading experts in behaviorism. At the time, one of his primary concerns was that people who forced children to comply were using coercion—something that anyone off the street could do, without specialized training.
The criticisms of the historical emphasis on compliance are valid when it comes to ABA as an intervention or therapy for autism. However, I’m not sure it is appropriate to extend this criticism to the field or science as a whole. When Lovaas first published his Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention (EIBI) research, quite a few aversive procedures were used. One explanation for this is the timing of the research and the experiences of autistic people at the time. That said, Lovaas is well-documented as having perspectives on disability that were demeaning to autistic individuals.
For many behavior analysts and proponents of behavior analysis, reconciling with that history can be difficult, but it is part of our field. If we don’t acknowledge this history and understand how procedures were developed in the 1970s and 80s, how can we improve our practices for clients in 2025?
When I first started in the field, we had programs called “compliance training,” the sole purpose of which was to create stimulus control over following any demand presented by an adult to a child. Personally, I think it’s important for everyone to be aware of these contexts and the fact that many centers, schools, and ABA providers still implement such programs without considering their potential side effects. What effect does it have on a person when they are forced to do something against their will? What learning history is being created for the person—either in relation to challenging behavior they engage in to escape being forced to do something, or in learning that they must comply with any demand at all times?
Additionally, many compliance programs are implemented as a first intervention, with little to no analysis and few attempts to build rapport and a strong teaching relationship beforehand. A program that simply requires someone to present instructions and force another person to follow them until the individual stops attempting to escape lacks analytical rigor and, technically, is not aligned with the science of behavior analysis. As such, these programs should not be included in learner programs.
On the contrary, there are many examples where behaviorists have paved the way for better treatment and pushed humane expectations forward. Early research in our field was primarily conducted in hospitals, inpatient facilities, group homes, and similar settings, where individuals typically had a low quality of life. Thanks to innovative applications of behavior analysis, new doors were opened for these individuals, and their quality of life improved.
However, we are products of an ableist society, and the early application of ABA as a therapy for autistic children placed more value on compliance training than on recognizing the humanity of the individual being served.
As a result, in 2011, I started coaching and training people to use alternative procedures and limit or avoid compliance training. It’s been exciting to watch the field adopt these procedures and move toward more compassionate, trauma-informed approaches. I think it’s fair to say that everyone providing ABA therapy from the 90s to the present was prioritizing the client's well-being as they understood it at the time. With credit to Maya Angelou, "Now that we know better, we must do better," and the field is shifting toward doing better.
What strategies or techniques are used in ABA to promote autonomy and self-advocacy while teaching new skills?
This largely depends on the services being provided. While behavior analysts can work on teaching these skills, they are not currently included in many of the widely used assessments or programming materials. For ABA service providers focused on promoting autonomy and self-advocacy while teaching new skills, strategies often include honoring assent withdrawal and using shaping procedures to help clients navigate difficult situations. However, approaches vary. Because this is a more recent area of focus, the scope and sequence—or full understanding—of all the component and composite skills involved in self-advocacy have not yet been fully developed. Teaching someone to self-advocate is more complex than simply stepping back when they display precursor challenging or distressed behavior.
In our revision of the 7 Steps of Instructional Control, now called the 7 Steps of Instructional Motivation, my co-author Robert Schramm and I discuss several key areas related to assent and self-advocacy. Here is a short excerpt from the book.
Can you explain the role of consent and collaboration between parents, children, and ABA practitioners in developing and adjusting therapy goals?
Consent and collaboration are essential in any ethical and effective ABA practice. Therapy goals should emerge from a partnership between parents, children, and practitioners. This process includes listening to the learner, even if they don’t communicate verbally, and observing their responses and preferences, which are key to guiding intervention. Parent input is also crucial, as parents know their child best and must play an active role in identifying priorities that align with the family's values and culture. Additionally, ongoing adjustments are necessary, as goals should evolve with the learner’s growth and development. Regular check-ins ensure that everyone’s voice—especially the learner’s—is respected. When goals are developed collaboratively, they become more meaningful and respectful to all involved.
How can parents differentiate between ABA programs that prioritize compliance versus those that honor and respect a learner’s neurodivergence?
The following are indicators of neurodiversity-affirming programs:
Language
Avoid programs that describe behaviors as "non-compliant" or "maladaptive."
Focus on consent
Good programs prioritize assent, which, at a bare minimum, allows the child to opt in or out of activities. Ideally, they follow a scope and sequence that honors assent withdrawal and teaches how to navigate difficult situations and self-advocate.
Skill building over behavior suppression
Programs emphasize teaching communication, self-regulation, and coping skills, rather than simply eliminating behaviors.
Respect for autonomy
Programs encourage choice-making and celebrate individuality.
Parent involvement
Providers who actively collaborate with parents and value their input. If a program's primary goal is compliance rather than connection, it’s a red flag.
Given the challenges of long waitlists and limited providers, how can parents advocate for a compassionate ABA approach that respects their family's preferences and values when seeking services for their child?
Parents can advocate for their child by asking questions about the provider’s approach to consent, collaboration, and neurodiversity. It’s also important to set expectations by clearly communicating your family’s values and non-negotiables (e.g., no forced compliance, respect for sensory needs). Educating yourself about ABA practices will also help you discern quality programs, and seeking out resources from neurodiversity-affirming organizations can be valuable. By advocating for your child’s well-being and autonomy, you can help ensure a better match with the right provider.
What should parents do if they feel their child’s ABA program is overly focused on compliance at the expense of their emotional well-being and individuality?
If parents feel that an ABA program prioritizes compliance over emotional well-being and individuality, it’s crucial to address these concerns in a way that centers the child’s autonomy and safety. Behavioral interventions should never come at the expense of a child’s well-being. Programs focused solely on compliance risk ignoring the child’s communication of unmet needs and can inadvertently contribute to stress, avoidance, or trauma. A more nuanced approach—one that centers interventions on the child’s safety, dignity, and unique strengths—helps create a foundation for meaningful growth. By prioritizing the child as a whole person, parents can ensure their child’s autonomy and emotional well-being are respected throughout the process. Here are some steps you can take:
Recognize the signs by reflecting on what raises red flags. Is the program pushing rigid compliance without considering the child’s sensory, emotional, or communication needs? Are there moments when the child’s autonomy or dignity seems compromised? If the child didn’t have a diagnosis, would the goals or methods be acceptable? Understanding these concerns can help frame a productive conversation with your provider.
Ask questions and seek clarity by requesting information on how the program supports the child’s emotional well-being, respects their preferences and sensory experiences, and by approaching the team with curiosity, asking, “How does this approach support my child’s autonomy and self-advocacy?”
Advocate for a shift in focus by requesting changes that align with neurodiversity-affirming practices, such as child-led activities, functional skills, assent, and emotional regulation, while emphasizing the importance of safety, connection, and co-regulation as foundational elements of the program.
Encourage collaborative goal setting by working with the team to redefine goals that prioritize meaningful, autonomy-building outcomes. For example, instead of compliance-driven goals like “sit still,” focus on fostering skills like self-advocacy or engaging in preferred tasks.
Monitor and reevaluate by observing whether changes are implemented and how your child responds. If the program resists adapting or dismisses your concerns, it may indicate that the provider’s approach is incompatible with your values.
If necessary, find a different provider who incorporates neurodiversity-affirming, trauma-informed practices. While waitlists and availability may be challenging, prioritizing an approach that values your child as a whole person is essential.
Trust your instincts as your child’s expert and advocate, and insist on practices that honor their individuality, autonomy, and emotional safety.
What is your definition of a good behavior analyst?
A good behavior analyst does more than teach new skills or reduce challenging behaviors—they create environments where clients thrive, feel seen, and experience joy. They are not just practitioners but also allies, advocates, and partners in their clients' journeys. Their work is guided by a balance of scientific rigor, ethical integrity, and compassionate responsiveness, making a lasting impact on the lives they touch. A good behavior analyst combines analytical rigor with compassion, creativity, and responsiveness to foster meaningful, lasting change in the lives of their clients. They embody the following qualities:
They center the individual by prioritizing the client’s voice, preferences, and autonomy. Additionally, they ensure that the client’s needs, strengths, and values guide every aspect of their work, actively involving the client in decision-making—even when communication occurs through alternative methods.
They engage in rigorous analysis by digging deep to understand why behavior is occurring or skills aren’t being acquired, rather than relying on surface-level assumptions. They approach behavior with curiosity, using data and observation to uncover patterns, environmental influences, and unmet needs.
They practice with compassion and responsiveness by recognizing behavior as communication and responding with empathy rather than judgment. They adapt in real-time, thinking on their feet to individualize interventions that honor the client’s dignity and current emotional state.
They create safety and trust by fostering an environment where the client feels safe and secure through consistent, respectful interactions that honor the client’s right to assent and withdraw. Additionally, they work to reduce stress and promote regulation through predictable routines, co-regulation, and cues of safety.
They are joy-bringers, engaging with clients in a way that makes learning fun, meaningful, and intrinsically rewarding. By focusing on positive experiences and connections, they ensure their presence adds more joy than difficulty to the client’s life.
They collaborate with families, educators, and other professionals to create cohesive, individualized plans that respect the unique dynamics of each environment. They also advocate for the client’s needs, ensuring their dignity, rights, and well-being are upheld in every context.
They commit to lifelong learning by actively pursuing ongoing education in areas like trauma-informed care, neurodiversity-affirming practices, and behavioral neuroscience. They challenge their own biases and remain open to evolving their practices to better serve their clients.
They uphold ethical standards by strictly adhering to guidelines that protect the client’s dignity, autonomy, and safety. Recognizing the limits of their expertise, they collaborate with or refer to other professionals when necessary.
What is one way neurotypicals can foster greater inclusivity for autistic individuals?
Inclusivity begins when neurotypicals shift from being passive allies to active collaborators, striving to understand and dismantle the systemic barriers faced by autistic individuals. It’s about creating a world where autistic voices are valued and their unique ways of engaging with the world are embraced as vital contributions to the richness of human diversity. Inclusivity is not charity—it’s justice, belonging, and a commitment to equity. Fostering inclusivity goes beyond surface-level acceptance; it demands intentional action, self-reflection, and a commitment to creating equitable spaces where autistic individuals can thrive. Here are key ways neurotypicals can contribute:
Listen, learn, and elevate autistic voices
Centering lived experience is essential. Value the perspectives of autistic individuals by reading their writings, following their social media accounts, and inviting them to lead discussions about autism. Their experiences are the most important for understanding how to foster inclusivity. Additionally, avoid making assumptions about what is best for autistic individuals. Instead of deciding for them, ask directly. Listening builds trust, understanding, and empowerment.
Challenge assumptions about behavior and abilities
It’s important to recognize that behaviors often have a functional or communicative purpose, even if they don’t align with neurotypical norms. Rather than labeling behaviors as "problematic" simply because they are different, it's crucial to approach them with understanding. Additionally, it’s important to recognize that competence and intelligence may not always align with traditional measures of communication or social engagement. By presuming competence, we can better support individuals in expressing themselves authentically, honoring their unique ways of communicating.Create truly accessible and flexible environments
When creating inclusive environments, sensory considerations are essential. Modifying lighting, noise levels, and seating arrangements can help accommodate sensory sensitivities, and offering options for quiet spaces or sensory breaks provides additional support. Communication options should also be prioritized, ensuring access to tools such as AAC devices, visual supports, or other alternative methods to express needs and preferences. Flexibility plays a key role as well, creating environments where expectations can adapt to individual needs, such as allowing movement during tasks, eliminating unnecessary social demands, or adjusting schedules to reduce stress.Focus on connection, not conformity
Inclusivity is about creating spaces where the authentic ways of being of autistic individuals are celebrated and supported, rather than teaching them to mimic neurotypical behavior. Work toward building relationships that honor authenticity by modeling respect for boundaries, offering clear communication, and fostering interactions that feel safe and validating.Celebrate neurodiversity as a strength
Shift the narrative from "fixing" autism to celebrating the unique strengths and perspectives that autistic individuals bring to communities, workplaces, and relationships, and advocate for structural changes that value diversity, such as inclusive hiring practices that embrace neurodivergent candidates and educational settings that affirm and support different learning styles.Commit to lifelong growth
Self-reflection is critical to fostering inclusivity. It requires examining personal biases, unlearning harmful stereotypes, and seeking a deeper understanding of autism beyond mainstream narratives. Inclusivity is not a one-time effort but an ongoing commitment to adapt, learn, and grow alongside the autistic community.
Can you recommend any resources for autistics, parents, or the providers who support them?
Here are some helpful resources for parents, autistics, and providers who want to learn more about neurodiversity-affirming and compassionate approaches.
My Resources:
The Do Better Collective
A community-driven platform offering webinars, workshops, and CE opportunities focused on neurodiversity-affirming and trauma-informed practices.Do Better Podcast
Episodes featuring discussions on assent-based practices, emotional regulation, and compassionate service delivery.Trailblazer Membership
Access to a library of CE content on advanced behavioral practices, including neurodiversity-affirming approaches and relational learning.
For Autistic Individuals:
Unmasking Autism
A powerful book on embracing authenticity and celebrating neurodivergence by Devon Price.The Neurodivergent-Friendly Workbook of DBT Skills
Practical tools for managing emotions and building self-compassion by Sonny Jane Wise.Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN)
Guides and advocacy tools created by autistic individuals, for autistic individuals.We’re Not Broken: Changing the Autism Conversation
A perspective on the challenges and triumphs of the autistic community by journalist Eric Garcia.NeuroTribes
A comprehensive history of autism and the neurodiversity movement by Steve Silberman.Neurodiversity Hub
A global initiative providing resources, education, and support to empower neurodivergent individuals in education, employment, and community life. The Hub fosters inclusive environments by collaborating with universities, employers, and organizations to promote awareness and celebrate neurodiversity.
For Parents:
Beyond Behaviors
Insights on understanding and responding to behaviors through a lens of compassion and neuroscience by Dr. Mona Delahooke.Unconditional Parenting
A resource emphasizing respectful, child-centered parenting practices by Alfie Kohn.Robyn Gobbel is a trauma therapist and educator specializing in attachment, trauma, and the nervous system. She provides resources, workshops, and courses to help families and professionals support children with challenging behaviors through a lens of connection, safety, and co-regulation. Her work integrates neuroscience with practical strategies for fostering emotional resilience and healing.
For Providers:
Do Better Collective Trailblazer Membership
A vibrant community for behavior analysts and professionals dedicated to advancing neurodiversity-affirming, trauma-informed, and compassionate practices. The membership offers access to a library of over 60 cutting-edge CE courses, live events, expert discussions, and exclusive discounts on workshops—all designed to empower practitioners to deliver ethical, impactful, and innovative services. Join to connect, learn, and make a difference in your practice.PFA/SBT Community
A professional community dedicated to advancing practices in assent-based and trauma-informed care within the field of behavior analysis. The platform offers resources, courses, and collaborative opportunities to help providers align their interventions with compassionate, ethical, and evidence-based approaches. Join the community to connect, learn, and grow in delivering respectful, client-centered care.
Connect with Dr. DeLeon on Facebook, TikTok, and LinkedIn. You can also find additional insights, practical strategies, and the latest in neurodiversity-affirming practices on the Do Better Collective website, or by following the movement on Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube.
-
UNDERSTANDING ASSENT
Assent goes beyond mere compliance. It involves the child's active involvement, understanding, and agreement with the learning goals and activities. Assent recognizes that autistic children express their preferences, interests, and choices in ways that may be different from their neurotypical peers. By acknowledging their assent, we can empower autistic children and foster a sense of ownership and agency in their learning process.
Respecting Autonomy
Respecting autonomy means recognizing and valuing the child's right to make decisions about their learning. Autistic children engage in different levels and forms of social communication and may have unique sensory sensitivities. It is vital to create an environment that supports their autonomy by providing choices, offering alternative methods of expression, and incorporating their interests into the learning activities. By respecting their autonomy, we can enhance their motivation and engagement. As a bonus this tends to lead to more effective learning outcomes.
Individualizing Learning Programs
Every autistic child is unique, and their learning needs and preferences will vary. Individualizing learning programs based on the child's strengths, interests, and abilities is essential for promoting their assent. Conducting thorough assessments and involving the child, their family, and a multidisciplinary team can help identify their strengths, challenges, and goals. By tailoring the learning activities to meet their individual needs, we can increase their sense of ownership, as well as, their motivation to participate actively and with learning intent.
Promoting Communication
Communication plays a crucial role in obtaining the child's assent. Autistic children may have differences with expressive language, social communication, or nonverbal cues. It is vital to honor and acknowledge their current forms of communication and to use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems, such as visual supports, sign language, or assistive technology to facilitate their growing communication. By providing appropriate support, we can ensure that the child can express their opinions, preferences, and choices effectively, thus promoting their assent.
Collaboration and Partnership
Collaboration and partnership among parents, educators, therapists, and other professionals are fundamental to promoting assent in learning programs for autistic children. Regular communication, sharing of information, and collaborative decision-making ensure that the child's perspectives and preferences are taken into account. By working together, we can create a supportive and inclusive learning environment that values the child's agency and promotes their overall development.
Tips for Assent Based Interventions
We want to conclude this chapter with a few tips for designing assent based interventions. These are not comprehensive in nature yet a good start in your journey. Four tips for creating assent-based interventions:
Identify non-negotiables
Identify degrees of freedom and choice
Acknowledge communication
Provide language models